My grandfather, your great grandfather, painted The Last Supper. His was the first
version I ever saw. It was as wide as he was tall, and he was a tall
man. He had it ornately framed, and it took up most of a small
guest-bedroom wall. Barely in grade school back then, I was in awe.
His
secret was paint-by-numbers. He was an absolute master of that rarely
studied genre, and, like most masters of arcane and disrespected arts,
he was without honor, even in his own home. My father and uncles saw
their father’s paintings as amusingly pointless monstrosities. My
grandmother, who aspired to the good taste of the college-educated
middle class that she vividly imagined but to which she did not belong,
tried to keep his masterpieces out of sight. His smaller paintings were
mostly relegated to the basement where he also kept his woodworking
tools, his workbench, and his breeding tanks for tropical fish. A later
generation would have called it his “man cave” or some such silliness.
He called it the workshop, full stop.
When I
was allowed to visit that dim downstairs, to stare at the golden green
glass tanks burbling with fish that sparkled, to be shown how the fry
were kept safe from eating each other, to gingerly handle the heavy
metal tools arrayed in neat rows over the workbench, I felt as if I were
in the viscera of an ongoing creation where my grandfather was a
demigod. His poorly lit but brightly colored paintings that lined the
basement walls could as well have been stained-glass windows to me, or
the Stations of the Cross, so heavy with solemn reverence the dank air
felt.
The tricks to his painting skills
included patience, restraint, a trust in authority, and a surgeon’s
steady hand. These also happened to be among his chief personal
characteristics. No matter how large the numbers rose—the larger
paintings came with kits counting over a hundred premixed colors—he
never by mistake or experiment put a dab in the wrong spot. No matter
how tiny and oddly gerrymandered the individual patches, he never
smeared two colors or strayed so much as a brush hair over a color line.
His
own family was considerably messier, both in practice and in
coloration. His middle son was a literal mutant who lived in a
wheelchair, dabbled in oils, and somehow became a moderately successful
cabinetmaker. His eldest son was a golden boy as tall as himself; his
youngest son struggled to get through school and married his pregnant
girlfriend when both were in their teens, a pattern repeated by their
own children. Some of the other grandchildren were mixed race,
individually and collectively, and included several adoptees. His
favorite grandchild may have been my Korean sister, Kim, who arrived in
the States as a badly malnourished three-year old in 1969 and who would
sometimes follow Grandpa around his house as a toddler, clutching the
remains of a breakfast orange that she refused to surrender, her
perpetual snot bridging her nose and her upper lip.
Nothing,
in fact, was well contained or precise about his grandchildren’s
generation, from our haircuts to our shapes to our behaviors, which is
one reason why my grandfather’s silent obsession with tightly confined
painting so fascinated me. His finished pieces were fantastic practical
lessons in the power of distance and perspective. When I stayed
overnight, I always asked to sleep in the little bedroom with that giant
Last Supper opposite my narrow bed. From across the room in
early morning twilight, it was impossible to see the dividing lines.
Subtle colors shaded into one another, shapes almost moved, and the
disciples’ diverse personalities glowed. You just needed the right angle
and the right light to see the genius of the despised thing.
It was a decade before I saw a painting by Georges Seurat, when I was on a high-school field trip to the Met, and realized how much could be done with distinct color dots. Parade de cirque.
I was thunderstruck. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, get on
the Internet and look. See that spooky figure in the center, hooded and
holding a trombone, entirely composed of tiny dots, just like all the
rest? Had no one told my grandfather such a thing was possible? Had no
one manufactured a paint-by-numbers kit to challenge a natural
pointillist, a kit in which every myriad number dictated precisely the
same-shaped dot?
A century before my
grandfather’s death, Seurat had painted the one musician who would have
been most appropriate at the funeral where I gave the eulogy. After the service I drove home, opened my third-hand coffee-table volume of Great Impressionist Art, looked
at the blurry, lurid reproductions of agreed-upon
greatness, thought of those long-lost number paintings that had been
disposed of when my grandparents moved into their last condo, and knew I should have wept.
No comments:
Post a Comment